DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Saab 9-3 vs 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SaabMakeAlfa Romeo
9-3Model156
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
210 km/hTop speed203 km/h
2290 ccEngine displacement2387 cc
150 HPPower136 HP
210 NmTorque304 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank63 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
—Average consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size205/60R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4629 mmLength4430 mm
1711 mmWidth1745 mm
1428 mmHeight1415 mm
1320 KgWeight1350 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Saab 9-3 and 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…