DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mercedes-Benz ML vs 2000 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercedes-BenzMakeSaab
MLModel9-3
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
177 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2295 ccEngine displacement2290 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
220 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank68 lt
17,8 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
12,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/75 R16Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4587 mmLength4629 mm
1833 mmWidth1711 mm
1802 mmHeight1428 mm
1855 KgWeight1320 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mercedes-Benz ML and 2000 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…