DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Saab 9-3 vs 2000 Pontiac Grand AM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Pontiac Grand AM

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SaabMakePontiac
9-3ModelGrand AM
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
3/5Doors2

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2290 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
150 HPPower141 HP
210 NmTorque203 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank54 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
—Average consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size215/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4629 mmLength4730 mm
1711 mmWidth1790 mm
1428 mmHeight1400 mm
1320 KgWeight1395 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2718 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Saab 9-3 and 2000 Pontiac Grand AM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Pontiac Grand AM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…