DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Rover Mini MK vs 2000 Citroen Berlingo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeCitroen
Mini MKModelBerlingo
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

12,7 s0–100 km/h17,5 s
148 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1273 ccEngine displacement1361 cc
63 HPPower75 HP
95 NmTorque111 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption10,3 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
—Average consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
145/70 R12Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3100 mmLength4108 mm
1440 mmWidth1698 mm
1350 mmHeight1802 mm
700 KgWeight1125 Kg
2035 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Rover Mini MK and 2000 Citroen Berlingo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…