2000 • Ford
Fiesta
Ford Fiesta 1.3 i (60 Hp) 2000Overall Score43.25/100
2000 Ford Fiesta vs 2000 Rover Mini MK Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Rover
Mini MK
Rover Mini MK 2000Overall Score43.5/100
WINNER
Rover Mini MK
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FiestaSpecificationRover Mini MK
FordMakeRover
FiestaModelMini MK
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3
Performance
Ford FiestaSpecificationRover Mini MK
15,5 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
155 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1273 cc
60 HPPower63 HP
103 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FiestaSpecificationRover Mini MK
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank34 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption8,5 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FiestaSpecificationRover Mini MK
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
165/70 R13Tyre size145/70 R12
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FiestaSpecificationRover Mini MK
3828 mmLength3100 mm
1634 mmWidth1440 mm
1320 mmHeight1350 mm
933 KgWeight700 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2035 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Fiesta and 2000 Rover Mini MK approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…