2000 • Fiat
Palio
Fiat Palio 1.2 i (60 Hp) 2000Overall Score43.25/100
2000 Fiat Palio vs 2000 Rover Mini MK Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Rover
Mini MK
Rover Mini MK 2000Overall Score43.5/100
WINNER
Rover Mini MK
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat PalioSpecificationRover Mini MK
FiatMakeRover
PalioModelMini MK
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Fiat PalioSpecificationRover Mini MK
16,5 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
153 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1242 ccEngine displacement1273 cc
60 HPPower63 HP
98 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat PalioSpecificationRover Mini MK
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank34 lt
9 ltUrban consumption8,5 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat PalioSpecificationRover Mini MK
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/65 R14Tyre size145/70 R12
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat PalioSpecificationRover Mini MK
4130 mmLength3100 mm
1626 mmWidth1440 mm
1475 mmHeight1350 mm
1025 KgWeight700 Kg
2423 mmWheelbase2035 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Fiat Palio and 2000 Rover Mini MK approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…