DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Rover Mini MK vs 1996 Opel Corsa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.5–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeOpel
Mini MKModelCorsa
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

13,4 s0–100 km/h19,5 s
140 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1274 ccEngine displacement1488 cc
50 HPPower50 HP
89 NmTorque90 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
34 ltFuel tank46 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption6,0 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
145/70 R12Tyre size145/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3050 mmLength3740 mm
1410 mmWidth1610 mm
1350 mmHeight1420 mm
645 KgWeight890 Kg
2035 mmWheelbase2445 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Rover Mini MK and 1996 Opel Corsa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…