1996 • Ford
Escort
Ford Escort 1.3 i (60 Hp) 1996Overall Score42.25/100
1996 Ford Escort vs 1996 Rover Mini MK Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Rover
Mini MK
Rover Mini MK 1.3i (50 Hp) 1996Overall Score42.5/100
WINNER
Rover Mini MK
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford EscortSpecificationRover Mini MK
FordMakeRover
EscortModelMini MK
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Ford EscortSpecificationRover Mini MK
17,1 s0–100 km/h13,4 s
154 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1274 cc
60 HPPower50 HP
103 NmTorque89 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford EscortSpecificationRover Mini MK
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank34 lt
—Urban consumption7,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,2 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford EscortSpecificationRover Mini MK
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/70 R13 TTyre size145/70 R12
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford EscortSpecificationRover Mini MK
4293 mmLength3050 mm
1700 mmWidth1410 mm
1394 mmHeight1350 mm
1030 KgWeight645 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2035 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Ford Escort and 1996 Rover Mini MK approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…