DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Ford KA vs 1996 Rover Mini MK Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeRover
KAModelMini MK
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

15,4 s0–100 km/h13,4 s
155 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1274 cc
60 HPPower50 HP
105 NmTorque89 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank34 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
—Average consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
155/70 R13Tyre size145/70 R12
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3620 mmLength3050 mm
1639 mmWidth1410 mm
1383 mmHeight1350 mm
890 KgWeight645 Kg
2448 mmWheelbase2035 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Ford KA and 1996 Rover Mini MK approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…