DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Rover MGF vs 2000 Volkswagen Sharan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Sharan

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeVolkswagen
MGFModelSharan
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeMinivan
2Seats7
2Doors5

Performance

7,7 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
212 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
145 HPPower150 HP
174 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 VR15; 205/50 VR15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3913 mmLength4615 mm
1628 mmWidth1810 mm
1264 mmHeight1728 mm
1060 KgWeight1650 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Rover MGF and 2000 Volkswagen Sharan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Sharan leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…