2000 • Audi
Cabriolet
Audi Cabriolet 1.8 20V (125 Hp) 2000Overall Score59.25/100
2000 Audi Cabriolet vs 2000 Rover MGF Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Rover
MGF
Rover MGF 1.8 i VVC (145 Hp) 2000Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Rover MGF
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi CabrioletSpecificationRover MGF
AudiMakeRover
CabrioletModelMGF
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
4Seats2
2Doors2
Performance
Audi CabrioletSpecificationRover MGF
11,5 s0–100 km/h7,7 s
195 km/hTop speed212 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
125 HPPower145 HP
173 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi CabrioletSpecificationRover MGF
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank50 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption—
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi CabrioletSpecificationRover MGF
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/55 VR15; 205/50 VR15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi CabrioletSpecificationRover MGF
4366 mmLength3913 mm
1716 mmWidth1628 mm
1379 mmHeight1264 mm
1370 KgWeight1060 Kg
2556 mmWheelbase2375 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Audi Cabriolet and 2000 Rover MGF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover MGF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…