DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Audi A4 vs 2000 Rover MGF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover MGF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A4SpecificationRover MGF
AudiMakeRover
A4ModelMGF
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

Audi A4SpecificationRover MGF
11,3 s0–100 km/h7,7 s
197 km/hTop speed212 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
125 HPPower145 HP
168 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A4SpecificationRover MGF
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,3 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A4SpecificationRover MGF
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/55 VR15; 205/50 VR15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A4SpecificationRover MGF
4479 mmLength3913 mm
1733 mmWidth1628 mm
1417 mmHeight1264 mm
1390 KgWeight1060 Kg
2607 mmWheelbase2375 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Audi A4 and 2000 Rover MGF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover MGF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…