DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Rover MGF vs 2000 Audi A4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover MGF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover MGFSpecificationAudi A4
RoverMakeAudi
MGFModelA4
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Rover MGFSpecificationAudi A4
7,7 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
212 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
145 HPPower125 HP
174 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover MGFSpecificationAudi A4
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,1 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover MGFSpecificationAudi A4
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/55 VR15; 205/50 VR15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover MGFSpecificationAudi A4
3913 mmLength4479 mm
1628 mmWidth1733 mm
1264 mmHeight1417 mm
1060 KgWeight1390 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2607 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Rover MGF and 2000 Audi A4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover MGF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…