DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Rover 800 vs 2000 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 800SpecificationVolvo S60
RoverMakeVolvo
800ModelS60
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Rover 800SpecificationVolvo S60
8,6 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
220 km/hTop speed225 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
180 HPPower180 HP
216 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 800SpecificationVolvo S60
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption12,8 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 800SpecificationVolvo S60
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 800SpecificationVolvo S60
4882 mmLength4576 mm
1730 mmWidth1804 mm
1393 mmHeight1428 mm
1395 KgWeight1533 Kg
2766 mmWheelbase2715 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Rover 800 and 2000 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…