DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Volvo C70 vs 1999 Rover 800 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

65.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo C70SpecificationRover 800
VolvoMakeRover
C70Model800
2000Model year1999
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Volvo C70SpecificationRover 800
9,3 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
220 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
180 HPPower180 HP
220 NmTorque216 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo C70SpecificationRover 800
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank68 lt
16,3 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
—Average consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo C70SpecificationRover 800
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo C70SpecificationRover 800
4720 mmLength4882 mm
1820 mmWidth1730 mm
1410 mmHeight1393 mm
1570 KgWeight1395 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2766 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Volvo C70 and 1999 Rover 800 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…