1999 • Nissan
Laurel
Nissan Laurel 2.0 24V (155 Hp) 1999Overall Score65.25/100
1999 Nissan Laurel vs 1999 Rover 800 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Rover
800
Rover 800 1999Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Laurel
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan LaurelSpecificationRover 800
NissanMakeRover
LaurelModel800
1999Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Nissan LaurelSpecificationRover 800
—0–100 km/h8,6 s
190 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
155 HPPower180 HP
186 NmTorque216 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan LaurelSpecificationRover 800
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank68 lt
13 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
—Average consumption8,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan LaurelSpecificationRover 800
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan LaurelSpecificationRover 800
4765 mmLength4882 mm
1730 mmWidth1730 mm
1400 mmHeight1393 mm
1390 KgWeight1395 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2766 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Nissan Laurel and 1999 Rover 800 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Laurel leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…