DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Rover 800 vs 2000 Volvo C70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 800SpecificationVolvo C70
RoverMakeVolvo
800ModelC70
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

Rover 800SpecificationVolvo C70
8,6 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
220 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
180 HPPower180 HP
216 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 800SpecificationVolvo C70
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption16,3 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 800SpecificationVolvo C70
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 800SpecificationVolvo C70
4882 mmLength4720 mm
1730 mmWidth1820 mm
1393 mmHeight1410 mm
1395 KgWeight1570 Kg
2766 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Rover 800 and 2000 Volvo C70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…