DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Rover 800 vs 2000 Peugeot 206 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Peugeot 206

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakePeugeot
800Model206
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h7,5 s
220 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
180 HPPower177 HP
216 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank50 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption—
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size205/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4882 mmLength3835 mm
1730 mmWidth1673 mm
1393 mmHeight1430 mm
1395 KgWeight1100 Kg
2766 mmWheelbase2442 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Rover 800 and 2000 Peugeot 206 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Peugeot 206 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…