E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Rover 75 vs 2003 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 75

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 75SpecificationBMW Z3
RoverMakeBMW
75ModelZ3
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

Rover 75SpecificationBMW Z3
10,3 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
193 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1951 ccEngine displacement1895 cc
131 HPPower118 HP
300 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 75SpecificationBMW Z3
DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank51 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption11 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 75SpecificationBMW Z3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 75SpecificationBMW Z3
4747 mmLength4050 mm
1778 mmWidth1740 mm
1424 mmHeight1288 mm
1510 KgWeight1220 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Rover 75 and 2003 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2003 Mercedes-Benz VaneoVS2003 Rover 75Mercedes-Benz Vaneo vs Rover 752003 and 2003 model years2003 BMW Z3VS2003 Rover 75BMW Z3 vs Rover 752003 and 2003 model years2003 Alfa Romeo 147VS2003 Rover 75Alfa Romeo 147 vs Rover 752003 and 2003 model yearsImage unavailableVS2003 Rover 75MG ZR vs Rover 752003 and 2003 model yearsImage unavailableVS2003 Rover 75MG ZS vs Rover 752003 and 2003 model years

Comments are loading…