DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZS vs 2003 Rover 75 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationRover 75
MGMakeRover
ZSModel75
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationRover 75
9,5 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
193 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1951 cc
113 HPPower131 HP
260 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationRover 75
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank65 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationRover 75
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationRover 75
4520 mmLength4747 mm
1700 mmWidth1778 mm
1390 mmHeight1424 mm
1225 KgWeight1510 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZS and 2003 Rover 75 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…