DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo vs 2003 Rover 75 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 75

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercedes-BenzMakeRover
VaneoModel75
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
181 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1898 ccEngine displacement1951 cc
125 HPPower131 HP
180 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
54 ltFuel tank65 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4190 mmLength4747 mm
1740 mmWidth1778 mm
1830 mmHeight1424 mm
1300 KgWeight1510 Kg
2900 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo and 2003 Rover 75 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…