2003 • Rover
75
Rover 75 2.0 CDTi (131 Hp) 2003Overall Score59.5/100
2003 Rover 75 vs 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Mercedes-Benz
Vaneo
Mercedes-Benz Vaneo 1.9i (125 Hp) 2003Overall Score59.25/100
WINNER
Rover 75
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 75SpecificationMercedes-Benz Vaneo
RoverMakeMercedes-Benz
75ModelVaneo
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Rover 75SpecificationMercedes-Benz Vaneo
10,3 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
193 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1951 ccEngine displacement1898 cc
131 HPPower125 HP
300 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 75SpecificationMercedes-Benz Vaneo
DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank54 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
—Average consumption8,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 75SpecificationMercedes-Benz Vaneo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 75SpecificationMercedes-Benz Vaneo
4747 mmLength4190 mm
1778 mmWidth1740 mm
1424 mmHeight1830 mm
1510 KgWeight1300 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2900 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Rover 75 and 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…