2003 • Rover
75
Rover 75 1.8 16V T (150 Hp) 2003Overall Score65.5/100
2003 Rover 75 vs 2003 Volkswagen Golf Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Volkswagen
Golf
Volkswagen Golf 2.0 TDI (140 Hp) 2003Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Rover 75
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 75SpecificationVolkswagen Golf
RoverMakeVolkswagen
75ModelGolf
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5
Performance
Rover 75SpecificationVolkswagen Golf
9,1 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
210 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
150 HPPower140 HP
215 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 75SpecificationVolkswagen Golf
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
—Average consumption5,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 75SpecificationVolkswagen Golf
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/65 R16Tyre size195/65 R15 V
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 75SpecificationVolkswagen Golf
4747 mmLength4204 mm
1778 mmWidth1759 mm
1424 mmHeight1485 mm
1420 KgWeight1318 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2578 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Rover 75 and 2003 Volkswagen Golf approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…