DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs 2003 Rover 75 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 75

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeRover
156Model75
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h9,1 s
209 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
140 HPPower150 HP
305 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank65 lt
8 ltUrban consumption11,3 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4435 mmLength4747 mm
1743 mmWidth1778 mm
1430 mmHeight1424 mm
1305 KgWeight1420 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Alfa Romeo 156 and 2003 Rover 75 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…