DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Audi A3 vs 2003 Rover 75 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 75

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A3SpecificationRover 75
AudiMakeRover
A3Model75
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

Audi A3SpecificationRover 75
9,7 s0–100 km/h9,1 s
202 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
125 HPPower150 HP
173 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A3SpecificationRover 75
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank65 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption11,3 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A3SpecificationRover 75
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A3SpecificationRover 75
4152 mmLength4747 mm
1735 mmWidth1778 mm
1427 mmHeight1424 mm
1160 KgWeight1420 Kg
2513 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Audi A3 and 2003 Rover 75 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…