2003 • Rover
75
Rover 75 1.8 16V T (150 Hp) 2003Overall Score65.5/100
2003 Rover 75 vs 2003 Fiat Stilo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Fiat
Stilo
Fiat Stilo 1.9 16V JTD (140 Hp) 2003Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Rover 75
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 75SpecificationFiat Stilo
RoverMakeFiat
75ModelStilo
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Rover 75SpecificationFiat Stilo
9,1 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
210 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1910 cc
150 HPPower140 HP
215 NmTorque305 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 75SpecificationFiat Stilo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank58 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
—Average consumption5,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 75SpecificationFiat Stilo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 75SpecificationFiat Stilo
4747 mmLength4516 mm
1778 mmWidth1756 mm
1424 mmHeight1570 mm
1420 KgWeight1430 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Rover 75 and 2003 Fiat Stilo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…