2003 • Rover
45
Rover 45 2.0 TD (113 Hp) 2003Overall Score60.25/100
2003 Rover 45 vs 2003 Great Wall Pegasus Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Great Wall
Pegasus
Great Wall Pegasus 2.2 4WD (105 Hp) 2003Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Rover 45
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 45SpecificationGreat Wall Pegasus
RoverMakeGreat Wall
45ModelPegasus
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Rover 45SpecificationGreat Wall Pegasus
9,8 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2237 cc
113 HPPower105 HP
260 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 45SpecificationGreat Wall Pegasus
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank64 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 45SpecificationGreat Wall Pegasus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 45SpecificationGreat Wall Pegasus
4517 mmLength4820 mm
1696 mmWidth1870 mm
1394 mmHeight1700 mm
1225 KgWeight1710 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Rover 45 and 2003 Great Wall Pegasus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 45 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…