E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda 6 vs 2003 Rover 45 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 45

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 6SpecificationRover 45
MazdaMakeRover
6Model45
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 6SpecificationRover 45
11,1 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
194 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
121 HPPower113 HP
310 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 6SpecificationRover 45
DieselFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 6SpecificationRover 45
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15 HTyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 6SpecificationRover 45
4700 mmLength4517 mm
1780 mmWidth1696 mm
1480 mmHeight1394 mm
1465 KgWeight1225 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda 6 and 2003 Rover 45 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 45 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2003 BMW Z3VS2003 Mazda 6BMW Z3 vs Mazda 62003 and 2003 model yearsImage unavailableVS2003 Mazda 6MG ZR vs Mazda 62003 and 2003 model yearsImage unavailableVS2003 Mazda 6MG ZS vs Mazda 62003 and 2003 model years2003 Rover 25VS2003 Mazda 6Rover 25 vs Mazda 62003 and 2003 model years2003 Rover 45VS2003 Mazda 6Rover 45 vs Mazda 62003 and 2003 model years

Comments are loading…