DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Toyota Hiace vs 2003 Rover 45 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 45

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeRover
HiaceModel45
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeSedan
8Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,8 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
110 HPPower113 HP
167 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
195/85 S R14Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4615 mmLength4517 mm
1690 mmWidth1696 mm
1935 mmHeight1394 mm
—Weight1225 Kg
2330 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Toyota Hiace and 2003 Rover 45 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 45 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…