DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Rover 45 vs 2002 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 45

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 45SpecificationSaab 9-3
RoverMakeSaab
45Model9-3
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

Rover 45SpecificationSaab 9-3
10,6 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
185 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
101 HPPower130 HP
240 NmTorque177 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 45SpecificationSaab 9-3
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank68 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 45SpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14 TTyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 45SpecificationSaab 9-3
4517 mmLength4629 mm
1696 mmWidth1711 mm
1394 mmHeight1428 mm
1305 KgWeight1295 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Rover 45 and 2002 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 45 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…