DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Nissan AD vs 2002 Rover 45 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 45

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan ADSpecificationRover 45
NissanMakeRover
ADModel45
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Nissan ADSpecificationRover 45
—0–100 km/h10,6 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1769 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
105 HPPower101 HP
149 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan ADSpecificationRover 45
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption7,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan ADSpecificationRover 45
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R14 T
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan ADSpecificationRover 45
4370 mmLength4517 mm
1695 mmWidth1696 mm
1475 mmHeight1394 mm
1130 KgWeight1305 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Nissan AD and 2002 Rover 45 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 45 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…