DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Saab 9-3 vs 2002 Rover 45 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 45

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-3SpecificationRover 45
SaabMakeRover
9-3Model45
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

Saab 9-3SpecificationRover 45
11,0 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
200 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1985 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
130 HPPower101 HP
177 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-3SpecificationRover 45
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank55 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-3SpecificationRover 45
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size175/70 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-3SpecificationRover 45
4629 mmLength4517 mm
1711 mmWidth1696 mm
1428 mmHeight1394 mm
1295 KgWeight1305 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Saab 9-3 and 2002 Rover 45 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 45 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…