DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Rover 45 vs 2000 Volkswagen Passat Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 45

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeVolkswagen
45ModelPassat
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
185 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
101 HPPower115 HP
240 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank62 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption12,3 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14 TTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4517 mmLength4703 mm
1696 mmWidth1746 mm
1394 mmHeight1462 mm
1305 KgWeight1340 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2703 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Rover 45 and 2000 Volkswagen Passat approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 45 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…