DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Laguna vs 2000 Rover 45 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 45

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRover
LagunaModel45
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
200 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
113 HPPower101 HP
168 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size175/70 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4508 mmLength4517 mm
1752 mmWidth1696 mm
1432 mmHeight1394 mm
1255 KgWeight1305 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Laguna and 2000 Rover 45 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 45 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…