DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda MX-6 vs 2000 Rover 45 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 45

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MX-6SpecificationRover 45
MazdaMakeRover
MX-6Model45
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Mazda MX-6SpecificationRover 45
10,4 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
204 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
115 HPPower101 HP
170 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MX-6SpecificationRover 45
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption7,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
8 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MX-6SpecificationRover 45
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 88 HTyre size175/70 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda MX-6SpecificationRover 45
4615 mmLength4517 mm
1750 mmWidth1696 mm
1310 mmHeight1394 mm
1120 KgWeight1305 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda MX-6 and 2000 Rover 45 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 45 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…