DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Rover 45 vs 2000 Renault Laguna Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 45

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeRenault
45ModelLaguna
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
185 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
101 HPPower113 HP
240 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank66 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14 TTyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4517 mmLength4508 mm
1696 mmWidth1752 mm
1394 mmHeight1432 mm
1305 KgWeight1255 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Rover 45 and 2000 Renault Laguna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 45 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…