DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Rover 45 vs 2000 Mazda MX-6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 45

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 45SpecificationMazda MX-6
RoverMakeMazda
45ModelMX-6
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
4Doors2

Performance

Rover 45SpecificationMazda MX-6
10,6 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
185 km/hTop speed204 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
101 HPPower115 HP
240 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 45SpecificationMazda MX-6
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption—
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,4 ltAverage consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 45SpecificationMazda MX-6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14 TTyre size195/65 R14 88 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 45SpecificationMazda MX-6
4517 mmLength4615 mm
1696 mmWidth1750 mm
1394 mmHeight1310 mm
1305 KgWeight1120 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Rover 45 and 2000 Mazda MX-6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 45 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…