2000 • Rover
400
Rover 400 2000Overall Score51.25/100
2000 Rover 400 vs 2000 Volkswagen Lupo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Volkswagen
Lupo
Volkswagen Lupo 1.4 TDI (75 Hp) 2000Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Rover 400
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 400SpecificationVolkswagen Lupo
RoverMakeVolkswagen
400ModelLupo
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
4Doors3
Performance
Rover 400SpecificationVolkswagen Lupo
11,8 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
185 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1422 cc
103 HPPower75 HP
127 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 400SpecificationVolkswagen Lupo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank34 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption3,5 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 400SpecificationVolkswagen Lupo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size185/55 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 400SpecificationVolkswagen Lupo
4490 mmLength3527 mm
1695 mmWidth1640 mm
1390 mmHeight1460 mm
1120 KgWeight984 Kg
2622 mmWheelbase2323 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Rover 400 and 2000 Volkswagen Lupo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…