DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Audi A2 vs 2000 Rover 400 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A2SpecificationRover 400
AudiMakeRover
A2Model400
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Audi A2SpecificationRover 400
12,3 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
173 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
75 HPPower103 HP
126 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A2SpecificationRover 400
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A2SpecificationRover 400
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/60 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A2SpecificationRover 400
3826 mmLength4490 mm
1673 mmWidth1695 mm
1553 mmHeight1390 mm
995 KgWeight1120 Kg
2405 mmWheelbase2622 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Audi A2 and 2000 Rover 400 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…