DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Rover 25 vs 2000 Rover 400 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 400

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 25SpecificationRover 400
RoverMakeRover
25Model400
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

Rover 25SpecificationRover 400
10,2 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
180 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
103 HPPower103 HP
123 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 25SpecificationRover 400
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 25SpecificationRover 400
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 25SpecificationRover 400
3990 mmLength4490 mm
1688 mmWidth1695 mm
1417 mmHeight1390 mm
1105 KgWeight1120 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2622 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Rover 25 and 2000 Rover 400 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…