DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Rover 400 vs 1999 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 400

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 400SpecificationRover 25
RoverMakeRover
400Model25
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

Rover 400SpecificationRover 25
11,8 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
185 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
103 HPPower103 HP
127 NmTorque123 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 400SpecificationRover 25
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 400SpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 400SpecificationRover 25
4490 mmLength3990 mm
1695 mmWidth1688 mm
1390 mmHeight1417 mm
1120 KgWeight1105 Kg
2622 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Rover 400 and 1999 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…