DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Rover 400 vs 2000 Audi A2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 400SpecificationAudi A2
RoverMakeAudi
400ModelA2
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Rover 400SpecificationAudi A2
11,8 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
185 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
103 HPPower75 HP
127 NmTorque126 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 400SpecificationAudi A2
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank42 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 400SpecificationAudi A2
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 400SpecificationAudi A2
4490 mmLength3826 mm
1695 mmWidth1673 mm
1390 mmHeight1553 mm
1120 KgWeight995 Kg
2622 mmWheelbase2405 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Rover 400 and 2000 Audi A2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…