DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Rover 400 vs 2000 Daihatsu Applause Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 400

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeDaihatsu
400ModelApplause
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
185 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
103 HPPower99 HP
127 NmTorque138 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size185/60R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4490 mmLength4350 mm
1695 mmWidth1660 mm
1390 mmHeight1385 mm
1120 KgWeight1050 Kg
2622 mmWheelbase2470 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Rover 400 and 2000 Daihatsu Applause approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…