DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Rover 400 vs 1992 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 80
RoverMakeAudi
400Model80
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 80
9,5 s0–100 km/h14,1 s
190 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
111 HPPower90 HP
137 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank66 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
9 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 80
4370 mmLength4482 mm
1680 mmWidth1695 mm
1400 mmHeight1406 mm
1075 KgWeight1270 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2612 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Rover 400 and 1992 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…