DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Audi 80 vs 1992 Rover 400 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationRover 400
AudiMakeRover
80Model400
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationRover 400
14,1 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
174 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
90 HPPower111 HP
182 NmTorque137 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationRover 400
DieselFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationRover 400
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationRover 400
4482 mmLength4370 mm
1695 mmWidth1680 mm
1406 mmHeight1400 mm
1270 KgWeight1075 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Audi 80 and 1992 Rover 400 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…