1993 • Fiat
Croma
Fiat Croma 1993Overall Score52.25/100
1993 Fiat Croma vs 1992 Rover 400 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Rover
400
Rover 400 1992Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Rover 400
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat CromaSpecificationRover 400
FiatMakeRover
CromaModel400
1993Model year1992
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Fiat CromaSpecificationRover 400
12,5 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
180 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1929 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
94 HPPower111 HP
200 NmTorque137 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat CromaSpecificationRover 400
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
6 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat CromaSpecificationRover 400
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat CromaSpecificationRover 400
4520 mmLength4370 mm
1760 mmWidth1680 mm
1430 mmHeight1400 mm
1240 KgWeight1075 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1993 Fiat Croma and 1992 Rover 400 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…