E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Rover 400 vs 1990 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 80
RoverMakeAudi
400Model80
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 80
9,5 s0–100 km/h14,6 s
190 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
111 HPPower80 HP
137 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank68 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 80
4370 mmLength4403 mm
1680 mmWidth1695 mm
1400 mmHeight1397 mm
1075 KgWeight1090 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2546 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Rover 400 and 1990 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1990 Geo StormVS1990 Rover 400Geo Storm vs Rover 4001990 and 1990 model years1990 Audi 80VS1990 Rover 400Audi 80 vs Rover 4001990 and 1990 model years1990 Audi 90VS1990 Rover 400Audi 90 vs Rover 4001990 and 1990 model years1990 Audi 100VS1990 Rover 400Audi 100 vs Rover 4001990 and 1990 model years1993 Fiat CromaVS1990 Rover 400Fiat Croma vs Rover 4001993 and 1990 model years

Comments are loading…