DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Audi 80 vs 1990 Rover 400 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationRover 400
AudiMakeRover
80Model400
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationRover 400
14,6 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
174 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
80 HPPower111 HP
155 NmTorque137 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationRover 400
DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption9,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationRover 400
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size175/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationRover 400
4403 mmLength4370 mm
1695 mmWidth1680 mm
1397 mmHeight1400 mm
1090 KgWeight1075 Kg
2546 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Audi 80 and 1990 Rover 400 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…