DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Geo Storm vs 1990 Rover 400 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 400

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Geo StormSpecificationRover 400
GeoMakeRover
StormModel400
1990Model year1990
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Geo StormSpecificationRover 400
12,4 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
200 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
130 HPPower111 HP
0 NmTorque137 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Geo StormSpecificationRover 400
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank55 lt
13 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
—Average consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Geo StormSpecificationRover 400
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Geo StormSpecificationRover 400
4150 mmLength4370 mm
1695 mmWidth1680 mm
1300 mmHeight1400 mm
1010 KgWeight1075 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Geo Storm and 1990 Rover 400 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…