DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Rover 400 vs 1990 Audi 100 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 100

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 100
RoverMakeAudi
400Model100
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 100
9,5 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
190 km/hTop speed176 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
111 HPPower90 HP
137 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 100
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank80 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9 ltAverage consumption10,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 100
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 100
4370 mmLength4793 mm
1680 mmWidth1814 mm
1400 mmHeight1421 mm
1075 KgWeight1200 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Rover 400 and 1990 Audi 100 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 100 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…